What is RRL in Research Paper? How to Work On it?
What is RRL in Research Paper?
A review of related literature (RRL) is a thorough examination of the current literature on a research or dissertation’s topic. You discuss knowledge and conclusions from existing literature related to your topic in RRL in a research article. If you uncover shortcomings or disputes in the current literature, you can highlight them in your review. As well as how you propose to handle or resolve these gaps or disputes through your research.
To conduct an RRL in the research paper, you must first locate relevant literature. You can do so by utilizing both online and offline resources, make a note of all relevant materials because you will need to cite them in your paper. As you progress through the resources, take notes and identify important themes to describe in the evaluation.
Determine how you want to structure the review before you begin. Such as whether you want to discuss the resources by topics, dates, relevance, and so on. Begin by describing the review’s context and goal while writing it. Then, depending on how you organized them, start talking about each of the resources provided. Before describing the main concept and points, you can include the title, writer, publication, and date for each. You can choose to list sections and sub-sections, as shown in this example, or keep it more unrestricted, as shown in this example. You can even hire PhD dissertation writing services if you cannot choose the list sections.
Importance of RRL in Research Paper?
- The value of a literature review in a scientific publication is being condensed into an analytical feature to allow for its multifaceted application. It improves the research’s credibility in several ways:
- 1. Interprets current literature in light of recent advancements in the subject. Also to aid in the establishment of knowledge consistency and the relevance of existing resources.
- 2. It aids in the calculation of the impact of the most recent information in the field by charting their knowledge advancement.
- 3. It establishes facts by bringing out the dialectics of inconsistencies between distinct concepts within the field.
- 4. The research gaps that are also examined to establish the most up-to-date facts and theories to offer value to the field.
- 5. Indicates the current position of research in a field’s schema.
- 6. Checks the research for relevancy and coherence by providing information.
- 7. Apart from demonstrating the continuity of knowledge. It also highlights areas that need extra examination, serving as a jumping-off point for future research.
- 8. The justified research and the research question are also established.
- 9. Establishes a theoretical framework for evaluating the research’s success. Including the research’s concepts and theories.
- 10. Examines the strengths and limitations of previous research in the same field. Assist in the adoption of a more suited approach for the research.
- 11. By comparing the findings to current literature, the relevance of the findings can increase.
- 12. By recording the findings in the scientific manuscript, it serves as a point of reference.
- 13. Allows the audience to give credit where credit is due for fact-finding and fact-checking in scientific articles.
- 14. The greater the number of relevant sources cited the higher the reader’s trustworthiness of it.
- 15. Helps to avoid plagiarism by customizing and adjusting the scientific manuscript. So that it does not copy someone else’s original idea.
- 16. It safeguards the scientific manuscript from rejection. So saves a lot of time and money by preventing plagiarism.
- 17. To help focus the study, it can use to assess, condense, and synthesize the gist in the author’s own words.
- 18. Aids in comparing and contrasting to prove the research’s originality and uniqueness in comparison to other studies.
- 19. Justifies the necessity of performing a specific study on a specific topic.
- 20. Allows any new research approach used instead of the existing ones by assisting in the accurate collection of data.
Steps of RRL in Research Paper/ How to Work on it?
Relevant publications are also included in the RRL when writing a research paper, then reviewing them and reporting your findings. There are five key steps to remember:
1. Look for material that is relevant.
2. Examine the sources.
3. Determine the topics, arguments, and gaps that exist.
4. Make a rough outline of the structure.
5. Write your review on the literature.
A good literature review is more than a list of references. It does analyze, synthesize, and assess to provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on the topic.
Step 1: Look for material that is relevant:
You will need a well-defined topic before you start looking for books. You will look for literature linked to your research problem and questions if you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper.
If you are doing a literature review as a stand-alone project, you will need to decide on a focus and plan a primary topic to guide your research. Unlike a thesis research question, this one must answer without using original information. You should be able to answer only based on an examination of the literature available.
Step 2: Examine the sources:
Make sure the sources you are using are reliable, and that you have studied any important studies or theories in your subject.
Your review’s scope will determine by your topic and discipline. In the sciences, you look at modern literature, but in the humanities, you could look back over a lengthy period of time.
Step 3: Determine the topics, arguments, and gaps that exist:
To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and framework. You must first understand the connections and relationships between the sources you have read, trends and patterns, Themes, Debates, Conflicts, Contradictions, and Pivotal Publications must find based on your reading and notes.
Step 4: Make a rough outline of the structure:
The body of a literature review can organize in a variety of ways. Before you begin writing, you should have a general notion of your strategy that you can combine many strategies, such as chronological, methodological, theoretical, and thematic, depending on the length of your literature review.
Step 5: Write your review on the literature:
Like any other academic document, your literature review should have an introduction, the main body, and a conclusion. What you include in each section will determine by the goal of your literature review.
A review of relevant literature (RRL) in the research paper is necessary to get a sense of the current state of knowledge on the subject. It establishes a structure for the investigator to construct a suitable hypothesis. Furthermore, an RRL directs the researcher in the direction of contributing something new to the area by avoiding replicating earlier efforts. The RRL should merge sources; it should also assess and test published studies to present a clear analysis of the knowledge on the issue.
Writing a literature review can help you advance in your career as a scientist by distinguishing you from the expert elite in your field. A thorough RRL in the research paper will guarantee that your hypothesis is well formulated in light of available information on the topic and that the proper approaches and methodologies are being used to solve the problem. To ensure validity, the RRL will direct reviewers and readers to relevant studies that support the current study’s assertions.